Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Alford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 17, 1943No. 36774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which William F. Martin, the relator, seeks to be reinstated as an employee of the Department of State Police and to obtain a judgment for his salary at the rate of $175 per month from August 5, 1941, until such time as he is restored to his employment.

During the year 1928, the relator was employed by the Louisiana Highway Commission as a highway patrolman. He retained this position until the Department of State Police was created by Act No. 94 of 1936, when he was transferred to and commissioned by the Department as a patrolman. On or about…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Clark v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People ex rel. Miller v. Justices of Court of General SessionsNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. McCabe v. Police BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. State Ex Rel. Calamari v. Orleans Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Chriswell v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Boudreaux v. AlFordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Schwehm v. MorrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API