Roost v. Wilber (In Re Parker)

OPINION

FRANK R. ALLEY, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on counts I and III of his complaint. Defendant filed a response to Plaintiffs motion and, through the motions of third-party defendants, a cross-motion for summary judgment on all counts. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be denied and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.

BACKGROUND

The essential facts in this case are a matter of public record, and are not disputed. The Debtor and Defendant (Debt- or’s ex-husband) divorced in May 1997 pursuant…