Jansen v. Atiyeh
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendants appeal a judgment denying their ORCP 71 motion for relief from i supplemental judgment awarding plaintiffs attorney fees. The trial court concluded that our decision in Jansen v. Atiyeh, 89 Or App 557, 749 P2d 1230, rev den 305 Or 576 (1988) (Jansen III), compelled denial of that motion. We reverse and remand.
This case has been before us on three occasions. We restate the relevant procedural facts from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Jansen v. Atiyeh, 302 Or 314, 316-17, 728 P2d 1382 (1986) (Jansen I):
“(1) The trial court entered its decree and injunction [in favor of plaintiffs] on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Condliff v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Jansen v. AtiyehCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Bryant v. CuniffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Steven A. Edwards v. Nancy AllenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005