Legal Opinion
Smith v. Haltom
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 2, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hast,' C. J.,
(after stating tlie ’facts). At the outset it may be stated that we have carefully read and considered the record, and if the defendant, W. Scott Hal-tom, had appealed we could have reached no other conclusion than that the chancery court properly granted the plaintiff, Lois iB. Haltom, a divorce from her husband, W. Scott Haltom, land awarded her the custody of their infant son. The court also was right in setting apart to the plaintiff one-third of all the real estate described in the complaint as belonging to her husband.
The case of Allen v. Allen, 126 Ark. 164, 189 S. W. 841,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hopping v. HoppingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- McLean v. McLeanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950