Legal Opinion

MHC Investment Co. v. Racom Corp.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided June 19, 2002No. 4:01-cv-90708PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PRATT, District Judge.

Plaintiff, MHC Investment Company (“MHC”), filed this action for judgment on a series of agreements between itself and Defendant Racom Corporation (“Racom”). Racom has pled affirmative defenses of fraudulent inducement, lack of authority on the part of Racom’s board of directors to enter the agreement, and lack of consideration. Racom has also brought counterclaims against MHC and the individual third-party defendants for fraud, civil RICO, slander per se, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff MHC now moves for summary judgment on its…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. v. Lauer Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. J.P. Morgan Trust Co. National Ass'n v. Cleberg (In Re Farmland Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2005
  3. Ohlson-Townsend v. WolfDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API