Legal Opinion

Crummer v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1925No. 25,790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

R. E. Crummer brought this action to recover for losses sustained by reason of the misconduct of Walter E. Wilson while state bank commissioner, the sureties on Wilson's official bond being joined with him as defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the ruling of the district court sustaining a demurrer to the petition on the ground of misjoinder of causes of action.

The position of the defendants is that the petition sets out a *69cause of action against Wilson and his bondsmen for official misconduct, and- also one against him for false…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmer v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Fitzgerald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. City of Anthony v. CorbinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Kansas Amusement Co. v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Crummer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API