Legal Opinion

Kansas Amusement Co. v. Eddy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,784; No. 32,892; No. 32,893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

These were actions on the official bond of a county treasurer. Judgment was for plaintiffs overruling the separate de*989murrer of the defendant insurance company to the petitions. The defendant insurance company appeals.

The cases were not consolidated, but they were argued together, and since with one exception, which will be noticed presently, they involve similar facts and identical legal questions, they will be covered by one opinion. The facts of case number 32,784 will be stated.

The facts are simple. Defendant Eddy was county treasurer of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ayers v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Moore v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Farmer v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. United States v. GreveDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1894
  5. Hitsman v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API