Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Rawlins district court; A. C. T. Geiger, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J. :

This action was brought by the state against M. A. Wilson, as county attorney of Rawlins county, and J. H. Chambers and John M. Burton, sureties on his official bond, to recover money alleged to belong to the state collected by Wilson. Under the provisions of chapter 242, Laws of 1895, entitled "An act to provide seed for the needy farmers,” etc., the state furnished Rawlins county seed grain which was sold to the farmers of that county in small amounts, aggregating $2661, the farmers giving their promissory notes for the amount received.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People of the State of N.Y. v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Nolley v. Callaway County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  3. McKee v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. City of San Jose v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Cressey v. GiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmer v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. County of Hawaii v. PurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Crummer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Forest County v. United Surety Co. of BaltimoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Stephens v. HendeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API