Legal Opinion

Fiss Corp. v. National Safety Bank & Trust Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 18, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

This is an action upon a certified check. Although the complaint does not so state, the chronology of events suggests and the argument has assumed that the plaintiff, payee and holder, procured the certification. I proceed upon that assumption. The effect of the certification was to discharge the drawer from liability, as the certification was equivalent to an acceptance (Negotiable Instruments Law, §§ 323, 324). When the bank certified the check it engaged that it would pay it to its lawful holder, and it cannot now resist payment in order to make a setoff available to its depositor; by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carnegie Trust Co. v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bank of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Wachtel v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Greenberg v. World Exchange BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Welch v. Bank of the Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berríos v. International General Electric, (P.R., Inc.)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. CONDENSER SERVICE, ETC., CO. v. Mycalex Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Berríos v. International General Electric (P.R., Inc.)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API