Wachtel v. Rosen
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
The complaint herein alleges that Arthur Wachtel, defendants’ testator, gave his check to plaintiff, drawn on the National Park Bank and that such check was duly presented by such holder for certification and 'certification refused. The complaint has been dismissed for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. An appeal to this court has been allowed on a certified question: “ Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? ”
The basic question is whether the refusal by a drawee bank to certify a check at the request of the holder…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradford v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Minot v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Bradford v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by8 opinions
- East River Savings Bank v. 245 Broadway Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Hamburger Bros. & Co. v. Third National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fick v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Fiss Corp. v. National Safety Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.