Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. World Exchange Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of Noonan, J.:

Noonan, J.

The defendant bank seeks to interplead Trotzky & Sons, Inc. On July 15, 1928, Trotzky & Sons, Inc., a domestic corporation, made a promissory note in the sum of $2,000, payable to the order of the plaintiff at the defendant bank on November 15, 1928. On the date the note was due the plaintiff payee had it certified by the defendant. Thereafter on the same day the plaintiff indorsed the note and presented it to the defendant for payment and payment was refused. Trotzky & Sons, Inc., on being notified of the certification asked the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooke v. . State National Bank of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Lyons v. Union Exchange National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Lipten v. Columbia Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd. v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Baldinger & Kupferman Manufacturing Co. v. Manufacturers-Citizens Trust Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dalessio v. KresslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Quistgaard v. EAB European American Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Admiral Leather Corp. v. Manchester Modes, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Fiss Corp. v. National Safety Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  5. Balducci v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API