Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Southland Produce Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1931No. Docket No. 6504PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendants Estrin and Garbns from an order made by the lower court vacating its previous order dismissing the action and also from the order granting plaintiff permission to file an amended complaint. The appeal on the ground last mentioned has been dismissed (98 Cal. App. 365 [276 Pac. 1036]).
Plaintiff filed her complaint in the court below claiming damages for alleged personal injuries against the Southland Produce Company and the Liberty Produce Company, corporations. An answer was filed by Liberty Produce Company, “a partnership”, and “Nick…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Van Landingham v. United Tuna PackersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ex parte HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Fisch & Co., Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Colby v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936