Legal Opinion
Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-0527 EGSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
1. Introduction
Plaintiffs are the Alliance for Democracy, Hedy Epstein, and Ben Kjelshus. Alliance for Democracy is a non-profit, non partisan grassroots organization advocating the full public funding of elections. Compl. ¶ 1. Hedy Epstein and Ben Kjel-shus are members of Alliance for Democracy and Missouri voters. Id. ¶¶ 2-3. For the purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiffs will be collectively referred to as “Alliance.” ' The Federal - Election Commission (“FEC” or “Commission”) is the independent agency of the United States Government…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Herron for Congress v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lindemann v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election PracticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- UNITED MOTORCOACH ASS'N, INC. v. WelbesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.