Legal Opinion

Herron for Congress v. Federal Election Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 8, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting the Federal Election Commission’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Two years ago, Roy Herron ran an unsuccessful campaign for Congress. Herron now alleges that his opponent violated federal law by failing to make certain disclosures in his filings with the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”). Herron 1 filed an administrative complaint with the FEC, which investigated the matter but decided not to issue any penalties. Herron then filed suit in this court, alleging…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Action NC v. StrachDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. La Botz v. Federal Election Commission of Washington, D.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Sibley v. AlexanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Noble v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIOCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Holmes v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API