Legal Opinion
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2005No. CIV.A.04-2145 JDBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) filed this action under the Federal Election Campaigns Act (“FECA”), 2 U.S.C. § 431 et seq. CREW seeks judicial review, as a party “aggrieved” under 2 U.S.C. § 437(g)(a)(8)(A), of defendant Federal Election Commission’s (“FEC”) decision to dismiss CREW’s administrative complaint. Presently before the Court is the FEC’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the FEC’s motion.
BACKGROUND
CREW is a non-partisan, non-profit watchdog entity…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campaign Legal Center v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Ctzn Respsble WA v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Freedman v. Federal Elections CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Gary Dickey Jr. v. Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.