Florence v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentRoberts, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion because I do not agree that “the Board’s resort to Weller is obscure.” 55 Or App at 470.
*471Weller v. Union Carbide Corporation, 288 Or 27, 29, 602 P2d 259 (1979), posed the following question: “Does a worker have a compensable claim where: (1) he has an underlying disease which is symptomatic; (2) his work results in a worsening of his symptoms not produced by a concomitant worsening of the underlying disease process; and (3) the worsening requires either medical services or results in disability or both?” The court then answered the question in the negative.1
T…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Autwell v. Tri-MetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cooper v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981