Legal Opinion · Dissent

Florence v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1982No. SAIF Claim ED 297834, CA A20340Published

1DissentRoberts, J.

I dissent from the majority opinion because I do not agree that “the Board’s resort to Weller is obscure.” 55 Or App at 470.

*471Weller v. Union Carbide Corporation, 288 Or 27, 29, 602 P2d 259 (1979), posed the following question: “Does a worker have a compensable claim where: (1) he has an underlying disease which is symptomatic; (2) his work results in a worsening of his symptoms not produced by a concomitant worsening of the underlying disease process; and (3) the worsening requires either medical services or results in disability or both?” The court then answered the question in the negative.1

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Autwell v. Tri-MetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Cooper v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API