Legal Opinion

Autwell v. Tri-Met

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1980No. WCB 79-3387, CA 16898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant’s knee condition is compensable. The referee and Board found that it is. We disagree.

Claimant had been a bus driver for Tri-Met since August, 1971. In December, 1978, he told the TriMet nurse that his knees had become progressively more painful over the past four years and he could not continue his job as a bus driver. Claimant then sought medical treatment first from Dr. Courogen and then from Dr. Butler.

The referee’s opinion states:

"The issue is essentially a medical question. It has not been an easy diagnosis for the treating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Gibson v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Johnson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Florence v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Florence v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Ivie v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API