Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Michelson
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARMON, District Judge.
The Court’s order entered on March 12, 1999 (Instrument # 32), is hereby VACATED, and the following order is replaced in its stead. Pending before the Court in the above referenced action is Plaintiff Maxim Medical Inc.’s (“Maxim”) application for temporary injunction. After reviewing the record, Defendant Mark Michelsón’s opposition, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the application should be GRANTED.
I. Background
This case involves the scope of a covenant not to compete agreement,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. LeslieDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Bayer Corp. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Ricky D. Parker and James Myers v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.