Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 2007No. 06-1243PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Gunter, Justice.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict in Sebastian County Circuit Court finding Appellant, Dr. Mark McCoy, negligent in treating Appellee Paul Montgomery for peripheral vascular disease. We affirm the jury’s findings.

Statement of the Case

Montgomery was referred to McCoy by his family physician after complaining of calf pain. McCoy saw Montgomery on June 15, 1998, and diagnosed Montgomery as having peripheral vascular disease. On June 25, 1998, Dr. Timothy A. Waack, a cardiologist, performed a Persantine nuclear stress test on Montgomery to evaluate the severity of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Ellis v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Cadillac Cowboy, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. C.D. Smith Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Potter v. City of TontitownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Bedell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Boellner v. Clinical Study Centers, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Travis Lumber Co. v. DeichmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Stromwall v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API