Legal Opinion

Safeway, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2001No. S-9009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After being dedicated to the public, a strip of land is accepted by the local government as a public street and later included on a highway right-of-way map by the State of Alaska, When the local government subsequently vacates the street, does the State retain an interest in the land? Because the State accepted the dedication by mapping the land as part of a highway right-of-way, and because local governments do not have the power to vacate the State's rights in land acquired for highway purposes, we conclude that the local government's action did not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Curtis v. Board of Supervisors of Clinton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCarrey v. KaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API