Legal Opinion

Brown v. Matias

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 18, 1984No. 83 Civ. 8373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendants in this federal civil rights action appeal from a decision of Magistrate Harold J. Raby, dated July 6, 1984, ordering disclosure of so-called G.O.-15 statements provided by five members of the New York City Police Department in connection with an investigation by the Civilian Complaint Review Board into the beating of plaintiff Lester Brown on August 2, 1983.

Because the underlying action is governed by federal law, privileges asserted in connection therewith are governed “by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. The Permian Corporation and Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Crawford v. DominicDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Sirmans v. City of South MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  2. Burke v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Skibo v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  4. In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
  5. State v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API