Legal Opinion
Schlosberg v. Shannon & Luchs Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1947No. 505PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Jack Schlosberg appeals from a judgment against him for $2,000 on a check given by him to Shannon & Luchs Company.
The check was given under the following circumstances. Shannon & Luchs Company, a real estate broker, acting as agent for Jack Coopersmith, negotiated a contract for the sale of real estate from Coopersmith to Schlosberg at a price of $65,000. When the agreement was signed by Coopersmith and Schlosberg the latter gave Shannon & Luchs Company his check for '$2,000 as a deposit to be applied in part payment on the purchase price. Shortly thereafter Schlosberg…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Naylor v. SteneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Willard F. Deputy & Co v. HastingsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
- Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- Mitchell v. Ralph D. Cohn, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Mulcahy v. GagliardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Popwell v. AbelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Stabler v. RamsayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Skinner v. HaugsethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Smith v. WorshamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Green v. Northeast Motor CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.