Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Gallagher

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 17, 1992No. 10913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

On July 19, 1990, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to “allocate support of judgment of unallocated alimony and support and terminate alimony.” No appeal was taken from this action of the trial court.

By a motion dated June 28, 1991, more than eleven months after the granting of the motion regarding allocation, the plaintiff filed a motion “to reopen judgment based upon fraud and lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” After a hearing, the trial court found that it had jurisdiction to grant the motion to allocate. No evidence of fraud was offered at this hearing, and the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Van Mecklenburg v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Misinonile v. MisinonileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Daniels v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Saradjian v. SaradjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Yeong Gil Kim v. MagnottaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. TarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Simmons v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Cohen v. Pico, No. 24 37 29 (Mar. 19, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API