Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Factory Mutual Insurance
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 23, 2002No. C02-387ZPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZILLY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff the Estate of James Campbell’s motion for partial summary judgment, docket no. 48. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, docket no. 48.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of an insurance claim made by Plaintiffs Clinton R. Churchill, David A. Heenan, Richard W. Gushman II, and Ronald J. Zlatoper, Trustees for the Estate of James Campbell against Defendant Factory Mutual Insurance Co. (“FM”), for mold and water intrusion damage at the Alderwood Plaza Shopping Center in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ingenco Holdings, LLC v. Ace American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Vision One v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of Vancouver, Washington v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.