Legal Opinion

Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 19, 2010No. Nos. 38411-6-II; 41021-4-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

fl Shoring equipment supporting a poured concrete slab collapsed during the construction of a condominium complex being developed by Vision One LLC and Vision Tacoma Inc. (collectively Vision). Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co., Vision’s insurance company, denied Vision’s insurance claim and Vision sued Philadelphia for breach of contract, bad faith, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW. The trial court ruled that the concrete slab collapse was covered under the “resulting loss” exception to the policy’s faulty workmanship exclusion. A jury found that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kalamazoo Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Westfield Insurance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. VISION ONE v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Gardens Condo. v. Farmers Ins. Exch.Washington Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Wagner v. American Family InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  5. KAAPA Ethanol, LLC v. Affiliated FM InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API