Legal Opinion

Fort Worth Lloyds v. Purcell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1975No. 4832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER, Justice.

Suttle Purcell recovered a judgment against Fort Worth Lloyds on a Texas Standard Fire Policy for $6,000. Lloyds has appealed.

Purcell’s building in Lamesa was damaged by an explosion on the premises adjacent to his on April 4, 1970.

Purcell pleaded that he had complied with all the conditions precedent to a recovery on the policy and with all of its terms and conditions. He further alleged:

“. . .In the event it should be found that any conditions precedent or requirements of said policy were not complied with, which is denied, then same were waived by the Defendant.”

Rule 94,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. TIME, INC. v. Maryland Casualty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kirk v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Coffey v. Fort Worth & Denver Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Kahla v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawyers Surety Corp. v. American Public Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API