People v. Kerrick
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime defined in section 357 of the Penal Code, of altering and defacing the marks and brands on certain twenty-two head of cattle with intent to steal the same and prevent the identification thereof. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.
At the trial it was admitted by the prosecution that the defendant had theretofore been duly tried upon an information charging him with the larceny of the same cattle referred to in this information, and that at such former trial the same evidence was used by the prosecution…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. DevlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Tilden v. Saucelito Land & Ferry Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.