Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 4, 1953No. 24Published
1Opinion of the Court
78 S.E.2d 290 (1953)
238 N.C. 451
STATE ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION
v.
MEAD CORP.
No. 24.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 4, 1953.
Jones & Jones, Franklin, and Joyner & Howison, Raleigh, for Nantahala Power & Light Co., appellant.
John R. Jordan, Jr., Blanchard & Jordan, Raleigh, David M. Hall, Sylva, Boyd Compton, Smith, Schnacke & Compton, Dayton, Ohio, for Mead Corp., appellee.
DEVIN, Chief Justice.
This proceeding was instituted by the application of the Nantahala Power & Light Company to the Utilities Commission for authority to increase its rates for electric power distributed to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Associated PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Laundry, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.