Legal Opinion

Bertrand v. API, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1985No. C8-84-1664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversed a determination by a compensation judge imposing liability for employee who contracted asbestosis upon the employer and insurer at the time when the disease resulted in disability in accordance with Flowers v. Consolidated Container Corp., 336 N.W.2d 255 (Minn.1983). Instead, the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals imposed liability upon the employer and insurer during the period of last substantial exposure of the employee to asbestos. Because the “bright line” rule of Flowers is limited to the case where the employee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Koppinger v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Pautz v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionHigh Court of American Samoa · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API