Legal Opinion

Smoot v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1942No. 6 Div. 966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal by both the complainant and respondent from a final decree in a cause which was here previously on appeal from a decree overruling demurrer to the bill of complaint. 238 Ala. 14, 189 So. 67.

Complainant assigns errors, but respondent has not done so, and the cause was continued as to the appeal of respondent. This was not pursuant either to the Code of 1940, Title 7, section 746, or to Supreme Court, Rule 3, as amended, 240' Ala. XVI. We do not wish to imply that an appellee may appeal from the same decree except as provided in those statutes. 4 Corpus Juris…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kinney v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Patton v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Stanley v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Webb & Aigner v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faust v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Odem v. McCormackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Ex parte CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API