Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Dunville

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action by the administrator of Leo J. Seymour for death and conscious suffering, resulting from a collision in the night between a truck, owned by the defendant and operated by his employee acting within the scope of his employment, and a Ford runabout owned and operated by the deceased. The verdict was for the plaintiff. The only exception argued is to the refusal of the judge to allow the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

At some time before the date of the accident, the seat of the runabout had been removed and a rear seat from a Hudson automobile had been bolted to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Screw Machine Products Corp. v. Union Light & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. Clay v. Pope & Cottle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Ironside v. IronsideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Nicholson v. BabbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Martin v. FlorinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API