Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2003PublishedCited by 159 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

A jury convicted defendant of intentional second-degree murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) for his role in the killing of a rival drug dealer. Defendant now claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel in contravention of the State and Federal Constitutions (US Const 6th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6). We conclude that the constitutional standard has been met because, in light of the circumstances of this particular case, defense counsel’s actions were within the reasonably objective range of performance (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. TongeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. BajanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. BriskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API