Legal Opinion

Krug v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1885No. 12,129PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The principal question in this case is set at rest by the cases of Paul v. Davis, 100 Ind. 422, Humphries v. Davis, 100 Ind. 274, Humphries v. Davis, 100 Ind. 369, Davis v. Krug, 95 Ind. 1, and Krug v. Davis, 87 Ind. 590.

The special finding shows that the appellant John Krug •entered into possession of the land in controversy under the title of his wife, Elizabeth Krug, and that the title asserted by her was acquired as the alleged heir of her natural daughter, Emily Davis, who became the adopted daughter of Isaac Davis and his wife, Jessie Davis. It is also stated in the finding""that a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Slauter v. FavoriteIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API