Legal Opinion

Farrell Co. v. Ihrig

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1908No. 7123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered September 3, 1907, granting plaintiif a new trial, after a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action of forcible entry and detainer.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action commenced January 3, Í907, by The Farrell Company, a corporation, against Mrs. C. Ihrig, in forcible entry and detainer, to recover possession of real estate in the city of Seattle. The plaintiff alleged that it had leased the property to the defendant at a monthly rental of $300, payable in advance on the first day of each month; that by proper legal notice, duly served, it had terminated such tenancy, and that the defendant wrongfully continued in possession. Upon the giving of bond, a writ of restitution was issued, under which the defendant was evicted, and the plaintiff was placed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Friedman v. ManleyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. O'Rourke v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Thomas & Co. v. HillisWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Money v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Williams v. BartzWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API