Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Kruidenier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1928No. Nos. 26,697, 26,735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeals by defendant from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial and from the judgment thereafter entered.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract to exchange certain properties. Plaintiff agreed to convey to defendant a large apartment building and lot in Minneapolis, Minnesota, subject to certain encumbrances. Defendant, in exchange therefor, agreed to convey to plaintiff a smaller apartment building and lot in the same city and a farm of 115 acres in Iowa, subject to certain encumbrances on each thereof. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. McKusick v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  3. Donlon v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Streissguth v. KrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Denoyer v. Railway Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Pierce v. Grand Army of the RepublicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Georgen-Running v. Bidwell (In Re Bidwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API