Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1962No. Civ. 6627PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The issues on this appeal arise out of the contentions of the appellants, who were protestants to the granting of an off-sale beer and wine license, that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, which is one of the respondents herein, did not consider two of their grounds of protest and that, for this reason, the order of that department granting such license should be set aside.
The premises for which a license was requested are operated by the respondents Dutton as a delicatessen and gourmet shop; are located on the National Forest highway, in a commercially restricted zone, in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Stoumen v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Otash v. Bureau of Private InvestigatorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Jack P. Meyers, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Smith v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD. HAROLD EUGENE SNOOKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Koss v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.