Frederick v. Morse
Supreme Court of Vermont
Case for alienation, of the- affections of plaintiff’s husband. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1910, Windham County, Taylor, J., presiding. Yerdiet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case. If a marriage ceremony is proved, it is presuméd that the celebrant was duly authorized. State v. Abbey, 29 Yt. 60;' Franklin v. Lee, 62 N. TI. 78; 14 Am. & Eng. Ene.
Read the full summary
Case for alienation, of the- affections of plaintiff’s husband. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1910, Windham County, Taylor, J., presiding. Yerdiet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case. If a marriage ceremony is proved, it is presuméd that the celebrant was duly authorized. State v. Abbey, 29 Yt. 60;' Franklin v. Lee, 62 N. TI. 78; 14 Am. & Eng. Ene. Law, pp. 520-522; Wilkie v. Collins,'48 Miss. 496; Fleming v. People, 27 N. Y. 329; Blanchard v. Lambert, 43 Iowa 228; Com. v. Hayden, 163 Mass. 453; People v.…
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
The ease was tried on a declaration in two counts, alleging alienation of affection and criminal conversation. The. plaintiff testified that she was married to George H. Frederick, her claimed husband, at Hoosick Falls in the State of New York, on the 29th day of November, 1905, by W. O. Jones, a justice of the peace. She offered no eye-witnesses of exchange of consent or marriage ceremony, except her own testimony. The plaintiff then produced a certificate of marriage corresponding to this testimony, and introduced competent proof of the signature. The plaintiff also testified to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- Pierce v. IndsethSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Kidder v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Town of Northfield v. Town of VershireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karchner v. MumieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Woodman v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940