Francisco Chamul v. Amerisure Mutual Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Harvey Brown, Justice
Francisco Chamul .suffered a serious work-related injury and filed a worker’s compensation claim • seeking lifetime-income benefits. His application was denied. After completing the administrative review process, the trial court granted summary judgment against him.
In two issues,.he contends that the trial court erred by (1) applying an overly restrictive definition to an undefined statutory term — imbecility—in support of summary judgment for the insurer and (2) finding that his treating physician’s affidavit qualifies as a sham affidavit and therefore is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John West v. North Branch Fire District 1Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021