Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Nocar and John Pendergast
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 18, 1974No. 73-1703, 73-1704PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
On the basis of the parties’ stipulated testimony, the trial judge found Joseph Nocar and John Pendergast guilty of knowingly and intentionally possessing a quantity of marijuana (18,772 grams) with intent to distribute the same, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 1 Defendants raise three issues on this appeal: (1) whether the Attorney General failed to update and republish in the Federal Register the schedules of “controlled substances” as required by 21 U.S.C. § 812(a), and, if he did, whether that failure precluded the defendants’ prosecutions for possession of marijuana; 2 (2)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Dennis Essington Green, United States of America v. Daniel S. FranoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Louis I. Gordon, Eduardo Jose Garcia, Jeffrey Mark Berg, James M. Cowen, and Eric Theodore LubovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Algienon TannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ernest Infelice and Mario GarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Robert Stinson v. Raymond RawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.