Legal Opinion

Robert Stinson v. Raymond Rawson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 2017No. 13-3343, 13-3346 & 13-3347PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Robert Stinson spent twenty-three years in jail for a murder he did not commit. No eyewitness testimony or fingerprints connected him to the murder. Two dentists testified as experts that Stinson’s dentition matched the teeth marks on the victim’s body, and a jury found Stinson guilty. After DNA evidence helped exonerate Stin-son, he filed this civil suit against the lead detective and the two dentists alleging that they violated due process by fabricating the expert opinions and failing to disclose their agreement to fabricate. The district court denied the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Patrick Dockery v. Sherrie BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Jerry Smith, Jr. v. Melvin FinkleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. William Hurt v. Matthew WiseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Timothy Johnson v. Michael RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Billie Thompson v. Lance CopeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API