Legal Opinion

Jenkins & Reynolds Co. v. Alpena Portland Cement Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1906No. 1,519PublishedCited by 27 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Jenkins & Reynolds Company, an Illinois corporation and a dealer in brick and cement, doing business at Chicago, Ill., was plaintiff below, and the defendant in error, Alpena Portland Cement Company, a Michigan corporation, and a manufacturer and seller of Portland cement, doing business at Alpena, Mich., was defendant below. The action was brought to recover damages for breach of contract. The declaration contained four counts, 'the last two of which were common counts. The first count alleged specially that on April 9, 1902, in Chicago,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Ambler v. WhippleSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  5. Schad v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API