Legal Opinion

Tepesch v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1941No. 45411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

Code section 1421 provides in part:

“3. The following persons shall not be deemed ‘workmen’ or ‘ employees a. A person whose employment is purely casual and not for the purpose of the employer’s trade or business.”

The industrial commissioner, reversing the deputy commissioner to whom the matter was originally submitted, held that appellant’s employment was “purely casual” and “not for the purpose of the employer’s trade or business.” The trial court affirmed the commissioner. Unless this finding is not supported by competent evidence, this court will not disturb it. If the evidence presents a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tunnicliff v. BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Gardner v. Trustees of Main Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Eichholz v. ShaftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Pfister v. Doon Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Bates v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Schuler v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Garrison v. GortlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API