Legal Opinion

Schuler v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1951No. 47958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

This appeal presents the single question: Is claimant barred from the benefits of the Iowa Workmen’s Compensation Act, under section 85.61 (3a), Code of 1950? The industrial commissioner and the district court held that he was and claimant has appealed.

Section 85.61 defines various terms used in the Act. *1305Paragraph. 3 thereof provides: “The following persons shall not be deemed ‘workmen’ or ‘employees’: a. A person whose employment is purely casual and not for the purpose of the employer’s trade or business.” (Italics ours.) In construing this provision we are definitely committed to the rule…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Case v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Gardner v. Trustees of Main Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Brewer v. Central Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Porter v. Mapleton Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. France v. BenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Worthington v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Henderson v. IlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Kerr v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Brandon v. RoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API