Legal Opinion

Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1997No. C9-97-152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant city challenges the district court’s remand of the city’s assessment. The district court found that the city’s assessment of the value of improvements to respondents’ property was too high, yet it did not establish a permissible assessment ceiling. We affirm and remand.

PACTS

Respondents John Marzitelli, et al. (Mar-zitelli) are the former owners of a residential property (the property) in the city of Little Canada (city), which is the appellant in this action. The city made street, curb, and gutter improvements in the area and assessed Marzitelli $5,158.75 for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Saric v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Schumacher v. City of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API