Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant city challenges the district court’s remand of the city’s assessment. The district court found that the city’s assessment of the value of improvements to respondents’ property was too high, yet it did not establish a permissible assessment ceiling. We affirm and remand.
PACTS
Respondents John Marzitelli, et al. (Mar-zitelli) are the former owners of a residential property (the property) in the city of Little Canada (city), which is the appellant in this action. The city made street, curb, and gutter improvements in the area and assessed Marzitelli $5,158.75 for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Saric v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Schumacher v. City of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997