Smith v. Mady
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHAUER, P. J.
Defendants, who were defaulting purchasers under an agreement to buy real property from plaintiff sellers, appeal from a judgment after a nonjury trial. On appeal the question presented is whether a defaulting buyer of realty is entitled to credit, against consequential damages charged to buyer, an increased price obtained by the seller upon a quick resale.
The essential facts are not in dispute. In September of 1980, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written agreement by which defendants were to purchase respondent plaintiffs’ residence for a purchase price of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Askari v. R & R LAND CO.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Spurgeon v. DrumhellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nielsen v. FarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Lawson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004