Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mady

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1983No. Civ. 68021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHAUER, P. J.

Defendants, who were defaulting purchasers under an agreement to buy real property from plaintiff sellers, appeal from a judgment after a nonjury trial. On appeal the question presented is whether a defaulting buyer of realty is entitled to credit, against consequential damages charged to buyer, an increased price obtained by the seller upon a quick resale.

The essential facts are not in dispute. In September of 1980, plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written agreement by which defendants were to purchase respondent plaintiffs’ residence for a purchase price of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Askari v. R & R LAND CO.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Spurgeon v. DrumhellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Nielsen v. FarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Lawson v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API