Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Royal v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. 00-2317PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

All agree that appellee-claimant Gerald Royal’s two industrial injuries have left his right arm barely functional. In 1996, he moved appellant Industrial Commission of Ohio for compensation for permanent total disability (“PTD”). A year later, a staff hearing officer (“SHO”) granted that application.

Appellant-employer Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation timely sought reconsideration, alleging that the SHO had (1) misread certain medical and vocational reports and (2) equated loss of use in one arm with statutory PTD. Reconsideration was denied on October 28, 1997, because the request did…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Foster v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gobich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Royal v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Waste Mgt. of Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State Ex Rel. Hackenburg v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-938 (8-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Wells v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (6-1-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API