Legal Opinion
Pace Communications, Incorporated v. Moonlight Design, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 11, 1994No. 93-2690PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Moonlight Design, Inc. imports and sells bridal gowns. It sought to advertise its gowns in Elegant Bride, a bimonthly bridal magazine owned by Pace Communications, Inc. Moonlight Design promised to take out 24 pages of advertising in Elegant Bride over a one-year period, but backed out on five of those pages. It also breached two additional agreements to purchase advertising. Pace sued, and after a bench trial the district court awarded Pace a judgment of just over $50,000. Moonlight appeals.
I
Elegant Bride’s target audience is made up largely of prospective brides. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership v. Dames & Moore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Timothy Herremans v. Carrera Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- LaSalle Bank Nat'l Assoc. v. Paramont PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.