Legal Opinion

Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership v. Dames & Moore, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 19, 1995No. 94-2761, 94-3663PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Dames & Moore, an engineering firm, performed a series of environmental risk assessments for the Alter Group, Ltd., between 1988 and 1990. Early in 1989 D & M evaluated the premises of Lind Plastic Products; it reported some asbestos but no underground contamination. Alter Group formed Pratt Central Park Limited Partnership to purchase the property. Later it came to light that the Lind property has two underground storage tanks containing hazardous chemicals. Alter (as we call both Alter Group and the partnership) has incurred cleanup expenses that it pegs at…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Meridian Security Insurance Co. v. David L. SadowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Coventry Sewage Associates v. Dworkin Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Catherine Gardynski-Leschuck v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API