Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. City of Klamath Falls

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1974No. 72-345EPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

This is an appeal under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, ORS 138.650, from a circuit court denial of relief from a conviction and sentence for a violation of the Klamath Falls municipal ordinance prohibiting disorderly conduct.

ORS 138.510(1) provides that a petition for post-conviction relief may be filed by one convicted “* * * of a crime under the laws of this state * * The threshold question of this case is one of first impression ① : whether violation of the municipal ordinance is a crime under the laws of this state as that phrase is used in the Post-Conviction Hearing Act.

An excellent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Morasch v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Miller v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Rupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hunter v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hunter v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. LaMarche v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API