Application of Stevenson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an indigent person accused of the violation of a municipal ordinance has a constitutional right to the assistance of counsel at public expense.
The petitioner was charged in the Municipal Court of Portland with the crime of disorderly conduct.① He pleaded not guilty, was tried, convicted and sentenced to six months in jail.② It is conceded that at the time *96petitioner was convictéd the court did not inform accused persons that if they were unable to employ counsel the court would,appoint counsel to represent them and the court did not, in fact,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.